Assessment 1B-News
Identify a strength or strengths in your assessment?
I feel I have given a lot of detail in Q1 and 2 by analysing the front covers (font, writing, pictures) and I have given varied analysis by making lots of different points.
What are the areas you need to improve?
I need to improve Q1 and 2 by including theorists to help display my points. I can improve Q3 by referring to the screencasting task and mention morning/afternoon news and how it changes- gives you updated news). For Q4 I needed to understand either theorists in order to answer the question in detail. I also needed to use my time efficiently in my other questions because I ran out of time in Q4.
What do you need to focus on for your next assessment?
For the next assessment I need to know my theorists better so I can confidently refer to them.
A-level Marksheet
AO1: Demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of the theoretical framework of media and contexts
of media and their influence
AO2 Apply knowledge and
understanding of the theoretical framework of media to:
Analyse
media products/Evaluate academic theories/ Make judgements and draw conclusions
Level
3
|
·
A comprehensive response to the set question
·
Comprehensive and
accurate knowledge and understanding
·
Convincing, perceptive and accurate analysis
·
Convincing, perceptive and accurate evaluation
·
Highly developed and accomplished judgements
and conclusions
The
response demonstrates a highly developed and detailed line of reasoning which
is coherent and logically structured. The information presented is entirely
relevant and substantiated.
|
Level
2
|
·
An adequate response to the set question
·
Adequate and generally accurate knowledge and understanding
·
Adequate and generally successful analysis
·
Adequate and
generally successful evaluation
·
Adequate and
generally well-reasoned judgements and conclusions
The
response demonstrates a line of reasoning with some structure. The
information presented is in the most part relevant and supported by some
evidence.
|
Level
1
|
·
A minimal response to the set question
·
Minimal application of knowledge and understanding
·
Analysis is minimal
and/or largely descriptive and may not be relevant
·
Evaluation is
minimal or brief, and is likely to be largely descriptive
·
Judgements and
conclusions, if present, are minimal with limited support
·
Information
presented is basic and may be ambiguous or unstructured. The information is
supported by limited evidence.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment