Comparison of Daily Mail and The Telegraph article of the car crash including 5 victims
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5118189/Five-people-killed-stolen-car-crashes-tree.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/26/five-killed-including-three-children-stolen-car-crashes-leeds/
Daily Mail
|
The Telegraph
|
|
Who was involved?
|
Brothers aged 12 and 14, a 15 year old friend, a 24 year old man and
a 28 year old father.
|
Two brothers (Ellis and Elliot aged 12 and 15), A third boy named
Darnelle Hart (15) and two men aged 24 and 28.
|
What happened?
|
Two 15-year-old boys were arrested on suspicion of causing death by
dangerous driving, they were involved in stealing a Renault Clio. Two victims
in the car died at the scene and 3 died later in hospital.
|
Two brothers (Ellis and Elliot aged 12 and 15) were killed due to one
of the boys stealing a car and driving it dangerously. Two men aged 24 and 28
also died.
|
Where did it happen?
|
Stonegate Road in Leeds
|
Stonegate Road, Leeds
|
When did it happen?
|
25th November at 10pm
|
Saturday night 25th November at 10pm
|
How did it happen?
|
One of the boys smashed the stolen car into a tree
|
One of the boys stole a Renault Clio car and crashed it into a tree.
|
Why did it happen?
|
This happened because they stole the car which is illegal and then
crashed into a tree due to lack of driving ability.
|
People died due to dangerous driving because they stole a car.
|
What do you notice about the difference in content and how the articles convey this information?
The Daily Mail definitely include more detail about the families and witnesses of the incident. They show individual images of all the victims involved allowing the reader to form a view on them. They show close up photographs of where the accident happened and the crowds of people mourning about the event which has just happened. They even include images of the notes people have written on bunches of flowers placed at the scene; this seems very invasive because these messages are private and personal, not to be seen by all the Daily Mail online viewers. Extending the invasive journalism are videos which have been taken following the fatal crash (participatory media). However the layout of this newspaper is clear because they have a list of bullet points right at the start of the article summarising what has happened.
In contrast, the Telegraph article of the same event seems to be a lot shorter but more simplistic. This newspaper use a lot less invasive pictures and a lot less of them. They use a shot of the street where the crash happened to let the readers know little information, this could be because they are respectful of the families.
No comments:
Post a Comment